Media Incoherence: Part 774898793874
Posted by RB in Blog on January 10, 2013 2:43 pm / 2 comments
Someone asked me recently why the media doesn’t highlight cases where someone with a gun stopped a bad person from doing something bad. This got me thinking.
I’ve heard the excuses, and I’m sure you have too. “If we make those people seem like heroes, it will prompt ‘vigilante justice’ and we don’t want that.” Or, “It will make people think they need to take the law into their own hands.” You know the drill. The media will make excuses for their failure to sensationalize actual acts of heroism when a gun is involved and the gun happens to be in the hands of the hero, not the bad guy.
This is the type of incoherence we get from the left – c’mon, let’s stop pretending the vast majority of journalists out there aren’t leftists, okay?
You see, the agenda here is: Guns are bad, mmmkay? So anything that would paint guns in a positive light is downplayed, even frowned upon. It must be so. The idiot masses (in their view) can’t think they can take personal responsibility for their lives, that’s the government’s job.
This isn’t a two way street, though. If it were, the same media wouldn’t sensationalize the cases where lunatics go on rampages using guns. Their logic would dictate that the same sensationalism would lead to more lunatics, seeing that they can become famous (even in death – they’re lunatics, after all), plotting murderous rampages and carrying them out. Why wouldn’t they? They can get their names plastered on the front pages of newspapers and websites for weeks. They can be held up as examples of evil (this is a good thing for them – again, they’re lunatics). They become infamous. Immortal.
For all the criticism the left (and some on the right) heaped on the NRA chairman when he responded to the Newtown attack, he was right. The media is part of the problem. Their selective coverage, their sensationalism of tragedy (usually to push an agenda) causes more tragedy because they’re appealing to lunatics.
Why not appeal to the rational people? Why not show people that they can rely on themselves in times of peril?
Because that hurts the left’s agenda.
Share This Post
-
The Media’s Willful Ignorance about Obama’s Make-Believe Ignorance
21 May, 2013
-
Five Things You Can Buy With Ed Markey’s Bounced Checks
16 May, 2013
-
Speaking Of Shady 501(c)(4) Non-Profits…
15 May, 2013
-
It’s Official: Obama Lied During Presidential Debate
10 May, 2013
-
Saudi Arabia Warned Us About Tamarlan Tsarnaev
1 May, 2013
-
Obama Vowed To Get Benghazi Attackers. Really?
21 May, 2013
-
The Media’s Willful Ignorance about Obama’s Make-Believe Ignorance
21 May, 2013
-
Proposal For Leftwing Media/Politicians Regarding the Oklahoma Tornadoes
20 May, 2013
-
Former Obama Press Secretary Wants the Administration to Explain AP Investigation
20 May, 2013
-
The Department of Justice Obtained the Personal Emails of a White House Correspondent
20 May, 2013
-
Rachael: Maybe they are waiting on the IG report....
-
Les Hardie: Why believe anything adm. officials say? Why believe White House counsel found o...
-
Caleb: pretty close onto the mark I'd say.salute ....
-
capt lou: When Obama and Holder move their lips--- It is another God Damned LIE coming out...
-
william: Nixon a republican was honorable he resigned other governors and senators resign...

2 Comments
Check this site out. It publishes stories nationwide about defensive gun uses. http://gunssavelives.net
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, people quit relying on their own brains years ago and I swear it all started when that lady sued McDonalds for spilling the hot cup of coffee in her own lap and WON!! I mean, SERIOUSLY!! Have you ever read the warning label on some products what a normal/sane person would view as common sense is printed right there on the label!! As far as the media goes, if it wasn’t for bad news ( according to them) there would be NO news!