Report: U.S.-Backed Weapons for Libyan Rebels Ended Up With Islamic Militants
Posted by Tommy in Blog, News, Politics on December 6, 2012 9:15 am / no comments
File this under least shocking news ever. According to some U.S. officials and foreign diplomats, arms shipments, that were backed by the U.S., and meant for Libyan rebels fighting Muammar Gaddafi’s forces ended up in the hands of militant Islamics. From The New York Times:
The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.
The report goes on to say that, while no evidence exists that any of these weapons were used in the attack in Benghazi that killed four Americas, the Obama Administration was clearly concerned that Qatar was turning them over to the militants:
The Obama administration clearly was worried about the consequences of its hidden hand in helping arm Libyan militants, concerns that have not previously been reported. The weapons and money from Qatar strengthened militant groups in Libya, allowing them to become a destabilizing force since the fall of the Qaddafi government.
Giving even more credence to that is this little nugget from the same story:
The United States, which had only small numbers of C.I.A. officers in Libya during the tumult of the rebellion, provided little oversight of the arms shipments. Within weeks of endorsing Qatar’s plan to send weapons there in spring 2011, the White House began receiving reports that they were going to Islamic militant groups.
I have long suspected the weapons used to murder Americans in Benghazi actually originated from the United States and it now looks more and more like that was indeed the case. I mean, they provided laughable control over who these weapons were being handed and new very quickly they were going to militants and did nothing? What did they think would be the end result? A blind man could have seen where this was headed.
Given this administrations incompetent response to the attacks, a horribly compromised scene, and their constant deflection in the aftermath, I doubt we’ll ever be able to determine with 100% certainty whether or not that was the case. Then again, I think that is exactly what this administration wanted from the beginning.
Share This Post
-
The Media’s Willful Ignorance about Obama’s Make-Believe Ignorance
21 May, 2013
-
Five Things You Can Buy With Ed Markey’s Bounced Checks
16 May, 2013
-
Speaking Of Shady 501(c)(4) Non-Profits…
15 May, 2013
-
It’s Official: Obama Lied During Presidential Debate
10 May, 2013
-
Saudi Arabia Warned Us About Tamarlan Tsarnaev
1 May, 2013
-
Yup. Eric Holder Perjured Himself.
24 May, 2013
-
Gee, Why Would IRS Target Tea-Partiers?
23 May, 2013
-
Obama Vowed To Get Benghazi Attackers. Really?
21 May, 2013
-
The Media’s Willful Ignorance about Obama’s Make-Believe Ignorance
21 May, 2013
-
Proposal For Leftwing Media/Politicians Regarding the Oklahoma Tornadoes
20 May, 2013
-
AGoyAndHisBLog: - Either he (by signing the request for the records) lied to the judge or Holder...
-
ss31704: We need to arrest Eric Holder. Quick call the Justice Department and ask Eric H...
-
CitizenEgg: Watching the Dems has been like watching a 2 year old with half a cookie in his ...
-
Albert Arthur: It does look like he's in a pickle. My guess is that he'll just pretend it didn'...
-
KP_Brown: And why, when Lerner was with the FEC, did the FEC decide NOT to look into a fun...

No comments
Be the first one to leave a comment.