Ezra Klein Gives Up The Big Lie
Posted by RB in Blog on January 31, 2011 10:57 pm / 4 comments
It seems that the latest blow to ObamaCare has Ezra Klein all flustered. It could also be that the guys at PowerLine laid the smackdown on him for trying to act like he knows what he’s talking about regarding Constitutional law. The PL guys didn’t understand that Klein was simply parroting the Center for American Progress talking points that made their way around the Lefty blogosphere. (I wonder if Journolist 2.0 is operating.)
So after his initial blog about the decision, the one where he was depantsed by PowerLine, Klein followed it up with this gem.
The legal theory currently in vogue in conservative circles holds that the Constitution’s vision of “a central government with limited power” — to use Judge Vinson’s phrase — permits the government to establish a single-payer health-care system that every American pays into through payroll taxes and that wipes out the private insurance industry but forbids the government from administering a regulated market in which individuals purchase private insurance plans and pay a penalty if they can afford coverage but choose to delay buying it until they’re sick.
There’s a chance conservatives will come to seriously regret this stratagem. I think it’s vanishingly unlikely that the Supreme Court will side with Judge Vinson and strike down the whole of the law. But in the event that it did somehow undermine the whole of the law and restore the status quo ex ante, Democrats would start organizing around a solution based off of Medicare, Medicaid, and the budget reconciliation process — as that would sidestep both legal attacks and the supermajority requirement.
The resulting policy isn’t too hard to imagine. Think something like opening Medicare to all Americans over age 45, raising Medicaid up to 300 percent of the poverty line, opening S-CHIP to all children, and paying for the necessary subsidies and spending with a surtax on the wealthy (which is how the House originally wanted to fund health-care reform). That won’t get us quite to universal health care, but it’ll get us pretty close. And it’ll be a big step towards squeezing out private insurers, particularly if Medicaid and Medicare are given more power to control their costs.
It has that huffy, “oh yeah! well…” feel to it. Ignoring the political reality that 1) the Progressive agenda (which includes single-payer) was thoroughly rejected in November and 2) for his plan to work Democrats would need to control the House (which they currently don’t), Klein gives up one of the central lies from the Left.
You see, for as long as we’ve been having this debate, the Left has denied that ObamaCare was meant to pave the way for a single-payer plan. It’s true that a few have let the truth slip out a few times, but the mainstream media would look the other way and refuse to cover it or even talk about it. Klein couldn’t resist. He said what they couldn’t really say too much before the vote for ObamaCare: They want to squeeze out the private insurers. ObamaCare is, in fact, a government takeover of Health Care. It’s Phase 1.
Klein is almost giddy with excitement over it. “You dirty Republicans really screwed up this time!! Now we’ll use the very tactics that got our butts kicked out of power in the House to do exactly what we wanted to from the start!”
It’s a little sad. Having been mocked for his remarks earlier in the year regarding the “confusing” language in the Constitution, then being smacked around by actual lawyers on PowerLine, Klein couldn’t just accept reality and dreamed up a scenario that is dead on arrival. And he acts like this was the plan all along.
Maybe when he’s able to grow a full beard (or finish puberty), the wunderkind might actually get a clue.
Recent Posts
Like TRS on Facebook!
Follow Us on Twitter!
Google Plus
-
Let’s Check Out A Guy From An Obama Ad
17 May, 2012
-
Boehner vs. Obama – The Speaker Lives In The Real World
16 May, 2012
-
Julia and Europe
16 May, 2012
-
Could Romney Romp to Big Win in November?
14 May, 2012
-
Tamron Hall Loses It
11 May, 2012
-
Let’s Check Out A Guy From An Obama Ad
17 May, 2012
-
Boehner vs. Obama – The Speaker Lives In The Real World
16 May, 2012
-
Shorter Politico: We’re Here For You Obama!
16 May, 2012
-
Move On Is Sad The DNC Has Moved On
16 May, 2012
-
Julia and Europe
16 May, 2012
-
Heather Hampton @6LambsMom: Happy Birthday TRS! I love what you guys are doing. Keepbup the good work!...
-
Jacob Perry: As a former, occasional contributor I am proud of my association with this site,...
-
margo: Wow! Why doesn't Fox or anybody showcase this information? I am disgusted!...
-
SWOhio: And another thing that makes me doubt that Obama & his campaign may not be t...
-
Jerry: Main stream media report this...get real! They have kissed Obama's ass since 200...

4 Comments
Of course Journolist 2.0 is operating. It’s too much fun to watch though. It’s almost as if we don’t know what they’re doing.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ben Domenech, Jimmie, R, R, R and others. R said: My late night post -> Ezra Klein Gives Up The Big Lie http://bit.ly/hvn7W9 – @theRightSphere #tcot [...]
When the Republican Party assaults any Democratic attempt to provide access to quality, affordable health care to all Americans and the Republican Party only offers the alternative of purchasing health insurance over state lines; what is the Democratic Party to do? Purchasing health insurance over state lines would effectively undercut State rights by allowing the insurance company to only follow insurance regulations of the local US governing authority in which it is incorporated, such as US territories which have no or very limited insurance regulations. This is no viable alternative in my view.
What I believe Ezra Klein is saying is that the Republicans are forcing the hand of the Democratic Party to pursue a Single-Payer alternative if the Supreme Court deems mandatory health insurance coverage to be unconstitutional (which to my understanding is constitutional under the interstate commerce clause). The goal of the Democratic Party is to ensure that all Americans, regardless of income, have access to quality health care. If the Republicans don’t like the HCR law strategy, then Single Payer is another option that would unquestionably be constitutional and would result in the same result of making quality health care accessible to all Americans.
Ian, you and Klein seem to have this blindspot where you just can’t accept that the Constitution doesn’t allow for what you want to do. At least not without a Constitutional amendment.